
So, the new sex and the city movie is out. After four long years of wait, the sequel came out and everyone was waiting with bated breath. I saw it. It was so lame in comparison to the series. The writing sucked. No witty one-liners, or sarcastic remarks. The plot was trite and the ending was terrible. A lot of critics wrote all this as well.
But, the one thing I didn't like was the constant mention of FASHION. A lot of the critics wrote about how FASHION was everywhere in the show and it came off as really superficial.
Yes, the focus on fashion was teeny-weeny bit excessive with labels shoved down your throat every other minute. But, everyone knows by now that SATC established lots of trends, and designers were everywhere..etc etc.
But how come no one says anything about James Bond movies? It's filled with cars, cool new gadgets and Bond treating women like disposable napkins. Soo....how come no critic ever mentions "James Bond is a superflous asshole who treats women like ornaments"
So it's ok for men to be materialistic..but not for women.
LAME. this hellish patriarchal society needs to die.
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Superficial women? NO WAY!
Posted by AP at 9:20 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment